Noam Chomsky wrote a most interesting and informative article published by In These Times, "Can Civilization Survive Capitalism?"
which is making the rounds through all the liberal, progressive and
leftist web sites and it is being posted all over on FaceBook and blogs.
This is good this article is getting the widespread
distribution it deserves but the discussion of this article seems to
kind of just end with praise rather than moving to "What needs to be
done?"
As usual, Chomsky makes an excellent case against
capitalism and in defense of democracy; but, also, as usual, Chomsky
fails to follow through on his anti-capitalist thinking leaving the
solution and our movement building to others to discuss--- those others
are us.
Chomsky articulated the problems with capitalist
democracy fairly well but failed to point out that Wall Street is our
enemy and it is this Wall Street enemy of ours we need to challenge for
power; not only to defend democracy (and Chomsky failed to point out
exactly what is required to defend democracy) but to be successful in
bringing about many other needed reforms.
What has changed in
this country since we have won all other reforms is not that capitalism
has "improved" or even that it has become so much worse--- even though
it has become the epitome of everything evil and disgusting; but, the
real change is that Wall Street is now so much more powerful that it can
resist and stand up to any challenge people bring forward with one
exception: Wall Street will not be able to withstand a challenge to its
power from a people united intent on bringing Wall street down.
A
defense of democracy is like all of our other problems we face and
experience in this "new world" dominated by Wall Streets raw power--- in
order to protect, defend and expand democracy requires challenging Wall
Street for power.
With Occupy Wall Street, Idle No More and the
climate change movement, why is it still so difficult to have this
discussion about the need to challenge Wall Street for power?
The answer to Chomsky's question is becoming more obvious to all of humanity by the hour:
No,
civilization can't survive under capitalism. So why are we waiting to
abolish capitalism? Why are we being so timid in bringing forward the
socialist solution as advocated by Albert Einstein over 60 years ago:
http://socialismtheoryandpractice.blogspot.com/2009/04/why-socialism.html
Here is Chomsky's article.
I would encourage everyone reading Chomsky's article to read Albert
Einstein's article on "Why Socialism?" because Einstein answers
Chomsky's question PLUS he provides an answer which Chomsky only
implies. In addition, Einstein provides the socialist alternative to
capitalism which Chomsky does not.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/14684/can_civilization_survive_capitalism/
I
made this comment in response to Chomsky, not as a criticism; but, to
add in what he has missed in this article published on the In These
Times web site:
Wall Street is our enemy. Capitalist power is
concentrated in monopolies at the helm of Wall Street. Every single
movement for peace (and the military industrial complex has the largest
carbon footprint of all), movements for jobs and full employment, the
movements for health care reform and the movement trying to halt global
warming--- no matter how large and powerful these movements become which
advocate reforms that would benefit people, Mother Nature and society
as a whole--- all come up against a brick wall. That brick wall--- our
common enemy is Wall Street. So, why aren't we advocating challenging
Wall Street for political and economic power instead of throwing up our
arms in bewilderment and exasperation in defeat when we aren't following
through with the struggle we need to wage: the struggle for working
class people's power.
We create peace movements, health care
movements, labor movements, jobs/full employment movements, civil rights
movements and now climate change movements but we don't follow through
in bringing all of these movements together into a huge anti-capitalist,
anti-imperialist, anti-monopoly movement bringing people into the
streets and to the ballot box.
In fact, we don't even have a
political party taking up the demands of our movements. Instead, the
major tendency has been to use the Democratic Party which is one of Wall
Street's parties to advance demands for reforms. Really, how likely is
it that a party like the Democratic Party which is controlled and
manipulated by our Wall Street enemies is going to allow us to use their
party to solve the very problems Wall Street in quest of maximum
profits has created for us?
As I see it, we have two tasks
confronting us--- bring all of our movements together so we can take our
struggles into the streets in a more powerful way and we need to create
some kind of working class based peoples party capable of being the
voice of the people in the streets and we need to begin the challenge to
Wall Street's power.
I doubt most of the present "leaders" of
any of our movements are up to the task of challenging Wall Street for
political and economic power since most are now the products of the
foundation-funded think tanks.
And who are the "philanthropists"
who fund these foundations which in turn fund all these "think tanks"
providing the "knowledge" to all of these movement "leaders?"
Aren't
these "philanthropists" the very same Wall Street capitalist parasites
who profit from the exploitation of our labor and the rape of Mother
Nature?
Capitalism has become an barbaric and cannibalistic
imperialist monster only capable of breeding wars, destroying our
ecosystems and our entire living environment.
Society needs these Wall Street capitalists about as much as my dog Fred needs ticks and fleas.
Our
movements, if they are going to achieve the successes--- solutions to
our many common problems--- which we seek are going to have to step up
the struggle to a new phase: working together united in challenging Wall
Street for power.
Think anti-capitalist/anti-imperialist education.
Think organizing to challenge Wall Street for power.
No comments:
Post a Comment